Torque Notes: Dual Response System

Torque Notes: Dual Response System

CINELLI
King Zydeco 2 · Engineering notes
Torque Notes
N°_03
DUAL RESPONSE SYSTEM
// FILE 01 · 08  ·  BOOT DUAL_RESPONSE.SYS
> loading structural model

One wheel.
Two answers.

Most frames pick a side. A stiff one drives sharp and beats you up; a soft one smooths the road and eats your legs. The King Zydeco 2 splits those two jobs down two separate structural paths from the rear hub, so a single wheel gets two behaviors at once. Cinelli calls it the Dual Response System.

King Zydeco 2 frame, dual response boot screen
Fig.01 — King Zydeco 2 framesetColumbus carbon monocoque
1130g
Frame weight · size M
−400g
complete bike vs original
+5%
BB stiffness vs gen 1
430mm
Chainstay length
45mm
Max tire clearance
1032mm
Wheelbase · size M
// FILE 03 · 08  ·  ONE_REAR_HUB.TWO_PATHS

One line, two behaviors

Draw a line from the top of the head tube to the rear dropout. Everything below it is built stiff. Everything above it is built to flex. You can read it straight off the tubes: deep, boxy chainstays under the line, thin flattened seatstays over it.

Both paths start at the same place. Every pedal stroke loads the rear hub, and from there the frame sends that energy down two routes that do opposite things on purpose.

Two load paths on the King Zydeco 2 frame, split by the head-tube to rear-dropout line
Fig.02 — Two paths from the rear hubbelow the line: stiffness · above the line: comfort
// FILE 04–05 · 08  ·  ZONE_A.POWER / ZONE_B.COMFORT

Two structures, one frame

Zone A — Power

Below the line

REAR_HUB > CHAINSTAYS > BB > DOWN_TUBE > HEAD_TUBE

The lower structure is short and deep. It ties the rear wheel to the bottom bracket, then carries the same stiffness forward into the head tube. Power you put through the pedals reaches the road with little lost to frame flex, and the front end holds its line when you sprint or dive into a corner.

On the King Zydeco 2 the bottom bracket is 5% stiffer than the first generation, and a more compact main triangle firms up the front end.

Zone B — Comfort

Above the line

REAR_HUB > SEATSTAYS > TOP_TUBE > HEAD_TUBE

The upper structure runs as one continuous carbon lay-up, with the fibers aligned to pass unbroken through the seat cluster. That lets it flex where a rider feels road buzz the most, damping vibration before it reaches the seatpost.

The gain is comfort that doesn't cost handling. Less vibration through the saddle means less fatigue over long, rough hours, and the steering stays as direct as Zone A makes it.

// FILE 06 · 08  ·  GEOMETRY.REAR

Built low, built short

Deep chainstays sit low around the bottom bracket. Dropping them where clearance is hardest to find opens room for 45 mm tires without stretching the back of the bike to get it.

So the rear end stays short. Chainstays hold at 430 mm, the wheelbase stays contained at 1,032 mm in size M, and the frame runs both 700c and 650b wheels. A 52 mm fork offset gives roughly 57 mm of trail on a 38 mm tire, quick steering for a gravel bike, which keeps it sharp into corners and fast to change direction.

// FILE 07 · 08  ·  PERFORMANCE.PROFILE

What the system targets

Plotted against a conventional single-behavior layout, the shape is the whole point: hold stiffness and reactivity high, and pull compliance and comfort up at the same time instead of trading one for the other.

Fig.03 — Dual Response vs conventional
POWER TRANSFER LATERAL STIFFNESS REACTIVITY COMPLIANCE (VERT.) SEATPOST COMFORT
Dual Response System Conventional layout
Fig.04 — Vibration at the seatpost
AMPL. FREQ (Hz) → 15–25 Hz conventional dual response
lower amplitude through the seatpost in the band a rider feels most
⚠   Fig.03 and Fig.04 are concept illustrations.  The curves and index shapes show design intent for the Dual Response System, not measured or lab-verified data. Verified figures are the specs in the strip above and the table below.
// FILE 08 · 08  ·  CHANGELOG vs KING_ZYDECO_1

What changed

The frame kit dropped 400 g against the first King Zydeco, about 15% of kit weight. Roughly 273 g of that comes from the Columbus Components integrated bar and seatpost, another 92 g from reshaping the frame itself. Frame and fork together are 6% lighter.

Stiffness held while the weight came off: bottom bracket up 5%, front end firmer from the more compact main triangle. Cinelli also added an XS size, smoothed the stack-and-reach steps between sizes for cleaner fitting, and revised the front derailleur area so the frame now takes modern road groupsets up to 52×36.

Full spec · MY26 catalogue
Parameter King Zydeco 2
Frame material Columbus carbon monocoque
Frame weight (M) 1,130 g (±5%, painted)
Fork weight (uncut) 456 g (±5%, painted)
Max tire clearance 700×45 mm (measured) · 650b + 700c
Chainstay length 430 mm (all sizes)
Wheelbase 1,009 mm (XS) → 1,054 mm (XL)
Head angle 70.5° → 72.5°
Seat angle 72.5° → 74°
Sizes XS · S · M · L · XL
BB shell Press Fit 86.5 × 41 mm
Headset IS 52/28.6 · IS 52/40
Cockpit Columbus Components Cento integrated bar
Seatpost Cinelli proprietary · double offset −10 / −20 mm
Cable routing Full internal · mechanical + electronic
Standards UDH ready · UCI approved
Colors Orange Safari · Bayou
Dual Response System
Torque Notes N°_03
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1998
1999
2002
2005
2010

VOCATO AL CAMBIO ELETTRONICO, SFOGGIA FRENO A DISCO E PERNO PASSANTE SU UN CARRO DAI POSTERIORI VERTICALI BASSI, PER LA MASSIMA AERODINAMICITÀ